Antibodies, of themselves, mean squat. The ABs produced by the body post infection are DIFFERENT from the ones induced by the faccines! Some Japs knew this fact.
I have reviewed the article by Emani et al from J. Vaccines and Vaccination. The last sentence of their "Vaccination Data" section describes the usual definition of "Vaccinated", with a two week lag from "Injected" to "Vaccinated."
In your discussion of "Antibodies" as an acceptable surrogate for "immune" I am in full agreement, and generally these are anti-spike antibodies. This is part of the crime, developing a scheme to produce the most toxic and mutable component of the virus rather than the nucleocapsid protein.
Returning to Emani, the graphs in Figures 5C and 6A could easily be used to make an argument for vaxxing. The definitions, as intended, hide the real outcomes. I would like to see all of these reports recalculated to show results as "injected" rather than "vaccinated" which I am sure many would find shocking. Maybe with the VAERS data showing the extreme 48 hour death rates plus use of correct definitions you might persuade your wife to leave the children alone.
Emani et al. focus on late 2021/early 2022. Hardly anyone was getting their first jab around that time, so I don’t think there are many recently injected counted among the unvaccinated.
The main data crime was committed by the ONS early in vax campaign.
Our campaign in Canada was notable for incompetence, supply challenges, and making and mixing vaxxes on the fly.
I couldn't do four-variable algebraic equations in my head as a student, let alone now (but driving a car in traffic often uses 4 or 5 simultaneous equations to avoid errors, and we do it pretty well most of the time.)
Recall the first Covid outbreak in Jan.-Feb., 2020, when lockdowns, etc., were imposed on Mar. 17. The cases, hospitalisations, and fatalities were already on the way down, but the interventions were claimed to have stifled the pandemic.
Our injections arrived in Feb., 2021, for "favoured" groups and have continued until now. It is likely an eight-dimensional problem to actually assess what happened, with age- dependence (at least three variables, non-continuous), time of injection versus prevalence, circulating viral strain versus Wuhan-targeted vaxx, ethnicity(Melanin inversely proportional to Vit. D adequacy), and so on.
With the Delta variant ,the VAERS report so closely aligned with the "Cases" that I thought that a fifteen-year old might have noticed the association. Emani et al. do present the entire pandemic, and I still believe that the definitional manipulation was the permissive basis for the datacrime.
This is interesting- yes presence of antibodies (just an arbitrary cut off point in a colour change reaction) are a convenient surrogate marker for effectiveness as all vaccinologists know that not one vaccine ever has been shown to be effective at promoting heath. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-evidence-that-any-vaccine
The level of immunogenicity (the degree of acute poisoning) is now taken for effectiveness. If the depop is the goal, this is definitely correct.
Antibodies, of themselves, mean squat. The ABs produced by the body post infection are DIFFERENT from the ones induced by the faccines! Some Japs knew this fact.
I have reviewed the article by Emani et al from J. Vaccines and Vaccination. The last sentence of their "Vaccination Data" section describes the usual definition of "Vaccinated", with a two week lag from "Injected" to "Vaccinated."
In your discussion of "Antibodies" as an acceptable surrogate for "immune" I am in full agreement, and generally these are anti-spike antibodies. This is part of the crime, developing a scheme to produce the most toxic and mutable component of the virus rather than the nucleocapsid protein.
Returning to Emani, the graphs in Figures 5C and 6A could easily be used to make an argument for vaxxing. The definitions, as intended, hide the real outcomes. I would like to see all of these reports recalculated to show results as "injected" rather than "vaccinated" which I am sure many would find shocking. Maybe with the VAERS data showing the extreme 48 hour death rates plus use of correct definitions you might persuade your wife to leave the children alone.
Emani et al. focus on late 2021/early 2022. Hardly anyone was getting their first jab around that time, so I don’t think there are many recently injected counted among the unvaccinated.
The main data crime was committed by the ONS early in vax campaign.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
Our campaign in Canada was notable for incompetence, supply challenges, and making and mixing vaxxes on the fly.
I couldn't do four-variable algebraic equations in my head as a student, let alone now (but driving a car in traffic often uses 4 or 5 simultaneous equations to avoid errors, and we do it pretty well most of the time.)
Recall the first Covid outbreak in Jan.-Feb., 2020, when lockdowns, etc., were imposed on Mar. 17. The cases, hospitalisations, and fatalities were already on the way down, but the interventions were claimed to have stifled the pandemic.
Our injections arrived in Feb., 2021, for "favoured" groups and have continued until now. It is likely an eight-dimensional problem to actually assess what happened, with age- dependence (at least three variables, non-continuous), time of injection versus prevalence, circulating viral strain versus Wuhan-targeted vaxx, ethnicity(Melanin inversely proportional to Vit. D adequacy), and so on.
With the Delta variant ,the VAERS report so closely aligned with the "Cases" that I thought that a fifteen-year old might have noticed the association. Emani et al. do present the entire pandemic, and I still believe that the definitional manipulation was the permissive basis for the datacrime.
This is interesting- yes presence of antibodies (just an arbitrary cut off point in a colour change reaction) are a convenient surrogate marker for effectiveness as all vaccinologists know that not one vaccine ever has been shown to be effective at promoting heath. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-evidence-that-any-vaccine
Jo
🐒
日本語でも記事を書いてますか？
書いてません。英語でも記事を書くのは以外と時間がかかりますよ😂。