Japanese mRNA consumers got some good news this week: they may soon be able to inject some domestically produced gene juice! I’m sure you all want to know just how effective it is. In a statement released on Tuesday, the firm said it conducted the trial on about 5,000 people aged 18 or older.
Antibodies, of themselves, mean squat. The ABs produced by the body post infection are DIFFERENT from the ones induced by the faccines! Some Japs knew this fact.
I have reviewed the article by Emani et al from J. Vaccines and Vaccination. The last sentence of their "Vaccination Data" section describes the usual definition of "Vaccinated", with a two week lag from "Injected" to "Vaccinated."
In your discussion of "Antibodies" as an acceptable surrogate for "immune" I am in full agreement, and generally these are anti-spike antibodies. This is part of the crime, developing a scheme to produce the most toxic and mutable component of the virus rather than the nucleocapsid protein.
Returning to Emani, the graphs in Figures 5C and 6A could easily be used to make an argument for vaxxing. The definitions, as intended, hide the real outcomes. I would like to see all of these reports recalculated to show results as "injected" rather than "vaccinated" which I am sure many would find shocking. Maybe with the VAERS data showing the extreme 48 hour death rates plus use of correct definitions you might persuade your wife to leave the children alone.
This is interesting- yes presence of antibodies (just an arbitrary cut off point in a colour change reaction) are a convenient surrogate marker for effectiveness as all vaccinologists know that not one vaccine ever has been shown to be effective at promoting heath. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-evidence-that-any-vaccine
The level of immunogenicity (the degree of acute poisoning) is now taken for effectiveness. If the depop is the goal, this is definitely correct.
Antibodies, of themselves, mean squat. The ABs produced by the body post infection are DIFFERENT from the ones induced by the faccines! Some Japs knew this fact.
I have reviewed the article by Emani et al from J. Vaccines and Vaccination. The last sentence of their "Vaccination Data" section describes the usual definition of "Vaccinated", with a two week lag from "Injected" to "Vaccinated."
In your discussion of "Antibodies" as an acceptable surrogate for "immune" I am in full agreement, and generally these are anti-spike antibodies. This is part of the crime, developing a scheme to produce the most toxic and mutable component of the virus rather than the nucleocapsid protein.
Returning to Emani, the graphs in Figures 5C and 6A could easily be used to make an argument for vaxxing. The definitions, as intended, hide the real outcomes. I would like to see all of these reports recalculated to show results as "injected" rather than "vaccinated" which I am sure many would find shocking. Maybe with the VAERS data showing the extreme 48 hour death rates plus use of correct definitions you might persuade your wife to leave the children alone.
This is interesting- yes presence of antibodies (just an arbitrary cut off point in a colour change reaction) are a convenient surrogate marker for effectiveness as all vaccinologists know that not one vaccine ever has been shown to be effective at promoting heath. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-evidence-that-any-vaccine
Jo
🐒
日本語でも記事を書いてますか？